Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Armstrong v. Mullikin Group, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Mullikin Group, Inc. doing business as Bath Fitters
Armstrong v. FACE Amusement Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kevin Armstrong and Elizabeth Buell
Defendant:
FACE Amusement Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller et al v. HG Ohio Employee Holding Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv03978
Plaintiff:
Janae Miller and Tylor Armstrong
Defendant:
HG Ohio Employee Holding Corp., HG Ohio Operations LLC, HG Ohio Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pairan v. Guardian Protection Services of Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Guardian Protection Services of Ohio, LLC, Guardian Protection Services, Inc. and Armstrong Group of Companies
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pairan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tackett v. Armstrong Utilities, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00229
Plaintiff:
Brant Tackett
Defendant:
Armstrong Utilities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstrong v. A+ Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02040
Plaintiff:
Kalea Armstrong
Defendant:
A+ Care Solutions, Inc. and Antonio White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Angelia Ruffin, et al v. Motorcity Casino
as 14-1444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELIA RUFFIN, PHILIP TIBBS, CONSTANCE HUDSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MOTORCITY CASINO, an assumed name of DETROIT ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company
Armstrong et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01023
Plaintiff:
Edith Armstrong and James Armstrong
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fraternal Order of Police et al v. Fletcher,et al
as 5:2007cv00011
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police, Fraternal Order of Police, Larry G. Bland and others
Defendant:
Ernie Fletcher, John D. Rees, Thomas Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
