Cases 111 - 120 of 2,596
Hammervold v. Beckwith
as 3:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Mark Hammervold
Defendant:
Larry Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bulluss v. Tomita Co., Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
stephanie bulluss
Defendant:
Tomita Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
King v. SCH Terminal Services, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. King
Defendant:
SCH Terminal Services, LLC, SCH Services, LLC, Calvert City Terminal, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Thompson v. Diversey, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thompson
Defendant:
Diversey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Clark v. Blue Care Network of Michigan
as 2:2022cv13016
Plaintiff:
Indeiria Clark
Defendant:
Blue Care Network of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan Doing business as BCN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sedric Ward v. Shelby County, TN
as 22-6054
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SEDRIC WARD
Defendant / Appellant:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN
McLeod v. UAW International et al
as 2:2022cv12938
Plaintiff:
Alexis McLeod
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, UAW INTERNATIONAL and LOCAL UNION 7, FCA US LLC and UAW International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foreman v. Eastman Schwartz Building, LLC
as 3:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
George Foreman, Jr.
Defendant:
Eastman Schwartz Building, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Romano v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2022cv12901
Plaintiff:
Ryan Romano
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stevens v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2022cv12894
Plaintiff:
Nichole Stevens
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
