Cases 21 - 30 of 2,599
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al
as 24-3275
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
Wurm v. Heidelberg University
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wurm
Defendant:
Heidelberg University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Schulte v. Medispec Ltd.
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kurt Schulte
Defendant:
Medispec Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Mitchell v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company, LLC
as 3:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mitchell
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Foods Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Hodge v. White et al
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
James Albert Hodge
Defendant:
Quin White and New Era Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Sigurani v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Verti Sigurani
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sigurani v. US Environmental Protection Agency
as 2:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Verti Sigurani
Defendant:
US Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Martin v. Lotic.ai, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Martin
Defendant:
Lotic.ai, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Floyd, Jr. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jiles K. Floyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
