Cases 111 - 120 of 786
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee
as 3:2020cv00068
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
United States of America v. Gulfport Energy Corporation
as 2:2020cv00340
Defendant:
Gulfport Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Tornstrom v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 1:2019cv02874
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Tornstrom
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Dynegy Zimmer, LLC
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Dynegy Zimmer, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States
United States of America, et al v. BP Products North America Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00190
Defendant:
BP Products North America Inc. and BP-Husky Refining LLC
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio and United States of America
Flint, City of v. Austin Morgan Companies
as 2:2019cv13543
Defendant:
Austin Morgan Companies
Plaintiff:
Flint, City of
Petitioner:
Christina Rasins
Ford Motor Company v. Storm et al
as 2:2019cv12425
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Duane Storm and Debra Storm
Plaintiff:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Goolsby et al v. Best in Neighborhood LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02664
Plaintiff:
Ron Goolsby and Allyse Goolsby
Defendant:
Keith Brown, Best Home LLC, Brown CRE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 1:2019cv13292
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan, Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
MI Dept of Environ. Quality, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 19-1318
Appellant:
KIMBERLY PALMER, BRUCE TENNISWOOD, CHERYL GROVES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
