Cases 1 - 10 of 873
McKamey v. Skrmetti et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Russ McKamey
Defendant:
Jonathan Skrmetti and Carter Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Audette III v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Robert Audette III
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGory et al. v. City of Sandusky, Ohio
as 3:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Blake McGory, Elaine McGory, Ernest Ettore and others
Defendant:
City of Sandusky, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Hartwig et al v. Clinton, Charter Township of et al
as 2:2024cv11357
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Hartwig and Donna L. Hartwig
Defendant:
Clinton, Charter Township of, Robert Cannon, James H. Elrod and others
Doe (RJC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RJC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. LaRose
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Tariq Shabazz
Defendant:
Frank LaRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv11290
Plaintiff:
Montaz Kennedy
Defendant:
Tera Jackson, Vanessa Jones, Rosco Harvey and others
Brown et al v. Yost
as 2:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Brown, Carlos Buford and Jenny Sue Rowe
Defendant:
David Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. RK Family, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
RK Family, Inc., RK Holdings, LLP doing business as Rural King and Shaun Amrine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
