Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sanderson v. Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP
as 2:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
J. Luke Sanderson
Defendant:
Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet, LLP
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hale v. E.J.H. Construction, Inc.
as 4:2023cv11742
Plaintiff:
Earl J Hale
Defendant:
E.J.H. Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morgan Stanley v. Richard Hale
as 22-3642
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC, dba Morgan Stanley Wealth Management
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD "RIP" HALE
Hales v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01090
Not Classified By Court:
Harry Johnson
Plaintiff:
Brian Hales
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Morgan Stanley v. Hale
as 3:2019oe00326
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley
Defendant:
Richard "Rip" Hale
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Morgan Stanley v. Hale
as 3:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley
Defendant:
Richard "Rip" Hale
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Morgan Stanley v. Hale
as 3:2019cv00327
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley
Defendant:
Richard "Rip" Hale
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Sherfey et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00776
Plaintiff:
Chad Sherfey , Barbara Simpson , Mark Farlow and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Henceroth et al
as 4:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Dale H. Henceroth, Melinda J. Henceroth, Ronald E. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dan Hale, et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety
as 15-6443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN HALE, HRC MEDICAL CENTERS, INC. and DON HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
