Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Franklin Bank & Trust Co. v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
as 3:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
Franklin Bank & Trust Co.
Defendant:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Banks v. First Security Trust Bank
as 1:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
Franklin Banks
Defendant:
First Security Trust Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin Bank v. Mart Trust, et al
as 09-2436
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANKLIN BANK, a division of First Place Bank, a federally chartered savings association
Defendant - Appellant:
MART TRUST and CADIEUX CORPORATION, INCORPORATED, a Michigan Corporation
Defendant:
MICHAEL EDWARD TINDALL, Individually and as trustee of Mart Trust, u/a/d August 28, 1992, TINDALL AND COMPANY, PC, Michigan Professional Corporation, MICHIGAN CATHOLIC CREDIT UNION, a Michigan chartered credit union and others
Franklin Bank v. Thomas et al
as 2:2008cv13729
Plaintiff:
Franklin Bank and Franklin Bank
Defendant:
Michael E. Thomas, Susan R Thomas, Jack O. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Franklin Bank v. Michael Tindall, et al
as 08-1451
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANKLIN BANK, a division of First Place Bank, a federally chartered savings association
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD TINDALL, Individually and as trustee of Mart Trust, u/a/d August 28, 1992, TINDALL AND COMPANY, PC, Michigan Professional Corporation, CADIEUX CORPORATION, INCORPORATED, a Michigan Corporation and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN CATHOLIC CREDIT UNION, a Michigan chartered credit union, MEMBER FIRST MORTGAGE, LLC, aka Michigan First Mortgage and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franklin Bank v. Tindall et al
as 2:2007cv13748
Plaintiff:
Franklin Bank and Franklin Bank
Defendant:
Michael Edward Tindall, Tindall and Company, PC, Cadieux Corporation, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
