Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Schacht v. Caruthers et al
as 3:2011cv00699
Plaintiff:
Linda P. Schacht
Defendant:
Bruce Caruthers and Brooke Yoole
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Synthetic Scents, Ltd. v. Old Faithful Outdoors, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv10297
Plaintiff:
Synthetic Scents, Ltd.
Defendant:
Old Faithful Outdoors, LLC and Aubrey P. Nathan
Counter_claimant:
Old Faithful Outdoors, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Synthetic Scents, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Prucher et al v. CMW International, Inc.
as 5:2010cv14246
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Prucher and lektrocorp
Defendant:
CMW International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
B & P Company, Inc. v. Sasa Online Stores et al
as 3:2010cv00209
Plaintiff:
B & P Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sasa Online Stores and Sohail Abdali
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
H-P Products Inc v. Buckeye Vacuum Cleaner Supply Company
as 5:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
H-P Products Inc
Defendant:
Buckeye Vacuum Cleaner Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Prucher et al v. CMW International, Inc.
as 2:2010cv10760
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Prucher and LektroCorp, Inc.
Defendant:
CMW International, Inc.
Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC et al v. Dufficy et al
as 2:2010cv10557
Plaintiff:
Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC, Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC, Domino's Pizza LLC and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Dufficy and Dufficy Enterprises, Inc.
Prucher et al v. CMW International, Inc.
as 5:2009cv12206
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Prucher, Bryan P. Prucher, LektroCorp, Inc. and others
Defendant:
CMW International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Intellectual Property
Chisnell v. Goode
as 2:2009cv12002
Plaintiff:
William R Chisnell
Defendant:
David P Goode
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
A&W Restaurants, Inc. v. Baker et al
as 3:2009cv00277
Plaintiff:
A&W Restaurants, Inc.
Defendant:
Tina M. Baker and William P. Baker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
