Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Braveman v. S & E Distributor, Inc.
as 2:2024cv10959
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN S BRAVEMAN
Defendant:
S & E DISTRIBUTOR, INC. Doing business as THE ODYSSEY GROUP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. RDJ Internet & Social Media, Inc., et al
as 24-5161
Plaintiff:
RONALDO DESIGNER JEWELRY, INC.
Defendant:
RDJ INTERNET & SOCIAL MEDIA, INC., INNOVATIVE COMPUTER SPECIALISTS CORPORATION, RONNIE E. NEEDHAM, individually and in his capacity as President of RDJ Internet & Social Media, Inc. and others
RJ Control Consultants, Inc., et al v. Multiject, LLC, et al
as 24-1138
Plaintiff:
RJ CONTROL CONSULTANTS, INC. and PAUL E. ROGERS
Defendant:
MULTIJECT, LLC, JACK ELDER and RSW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Tapestry, Inc. et al v. Rigdon et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach Services, Inc. and Kate Spade, LLC
Defendant:
Jo Ann Sanders Rigdon, Sheri E. Sanders Smith, The Pink Daisy Market, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Mark Feldstein & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Feldstein & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Noxgear, LLC v. E-Filliate, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03813
Plaintiff:
Noxgear, LLC
Defendant:
E-Filliate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
RJ Control Consultants, Inc., et al v. Multiject, LLC, et al
as 23-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RJ CONTROL CONSULTANTS, INC. and PAUL E. ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MULTIJECT, LLC, RSW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and JACK ELDER
Nancy Cheairs v. Mark Thomas, et al
as 23-5496
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NANCY CHEAIRS
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MEMPHIS PROFESSIONAL IMAGING, INC., HELEN THOMAS and others
Kelly v. Worth et al
as 3:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Sean E. Kelly
Defendant:
Charles Worth and Empire Distribution INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
