Cases 121 - 130 of 246
Reeves v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv01263
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Reeves
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ellington v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
Rommel S. Ellington
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barham v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv01259
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Barham
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hall v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv02773
Appellant:
Daniel R. Hall
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Green v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv01251
Plaintiff:
Leandra Green
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv02737
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Appellant:
Freddie Davis
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
collins v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00797
Plaintiff:
eric collins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Beans v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv02707
Appellant:
Gwendolyn Beans
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bardwell v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv01228
Plaintiff:
Felicia Bardwell
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robert Major v. Michael Astrue
as 09-4228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. MAJOR
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
