Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Tate v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
Adam R. Tate
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Christy Mashell Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
April Adams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv04082
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Brittany N. Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv11801
Plaintiff:
Sandra D. Adams
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Adams, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jenny Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-3284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNY L. ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Bigford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Adam Garfield Bigford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv04167
Plaintiff:
Denise Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hampton v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2022cv12737
Plaintiff:
Adam Joseph Hampton
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
