Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Phillips v. SSA
as 7:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Conley Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wortham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00303
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Phillip Erwin Wortham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv01870
Plaintiff:
Phillip Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Amy Phillips v. Comm of Social Security
as 23-1368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY V. PHILLIPS, fka Amy V. Swartout
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Claxton v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Phillip Larry Claxton
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Phillips v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2023cv10517
Plaintiff:
Esther Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Miller v. SSA
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dwayne Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Travis C. Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
