Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shively v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2011cv00635
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Shively
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Slominski v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Slominski
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Demogola v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2010cv01169
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Demogola
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alley v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 4:2010cv11743
Plaintiff:
Diane Louise Alley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stockman v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Judy E. Stockman
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bobbette Byard v. HHS, et al
as 09-1010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBETTE BYARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Mark Spaulding v. HHS
as 08-5447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK SPAULDING
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Donna E. Shalala, M.D. Secretary
Wilson v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2007fp00336
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Wilson
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Claeys v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2006cv00917
Plaintiff:
Keith Claeys
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
