Cases 161 - 170 of 285
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lisa Peterson, et al v. James Dean, et al
as 13-502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA PETERSON, MARY LYNN BUSH, DIANE CASHON and others
Plaintiff:
H. HOOPER PENUEL and LARRY ROE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DEAN, WALTEEN PARKER, BARBARA VANATTA, acting under color of state law and in their official capacity as members of the DeKalb County Election Commission, and individually and others
Defendant:
OSCAR GARDNER and TOM WALKER, acting under color of state law and in their official capacity as members of the Rutherford County Election Commission, and individually
USA v. Michael Parker
as 13-3700
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL PARKER
Secretary, U.S. Dept. of HUD v. Kathy Parker, et al
as 13-3623
Petitioner:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, on behalf of Housing Advocates, Inc.
Respondent:
KATHY PARKER and DERYL GIBSON
Parker v. Palisades Collection, LLC
as 2:2013cv11933
Plaintiff:
Frank Parker
Defendant:
Palisades Collection, LLC
USA v. Bryon Parker
as 13-5172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRYON S. PARKER
Vorce #09764-089 v. Lake Michigan Credit Union et al
as 1:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Bruce Vorce #09764-089
Defendant:
Lake Michigan Credit Union, Sandra Jelinski, Gretchen Tellman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: Terrell A. Burge
as 13-5109
Movant:
In re: TERRELL A. BURGESS
Respondent:
TONY PARKER, Warden
Laborers' Local 265 Pension Fund, et al v. iShares Trust, et al
as 3:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Local 265 Pension Fund and Plumbers and Pipefitters Local No. 572 Pension Fund
Defendant:
iShares Trust , iShares, Inc. , iShares Russell Midcap Index Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 80
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
