Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02590
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Robert Modrall v. U.S. Department of Education
as 20-5608
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT GREGORY MODRALL, Dr.
Gbur et al v. Devos et al
as 4:2020cv11492
Defendant:
Betty Devos and U.S. Department of Education
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Sue Gbur, Michael A. Gbur and Madeline Gbur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheila Armstrong v. MI Bureau of Serv for Blind, et al
as 19-2179
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KING, JR., JAMES HULL, EDWARD ROGERS, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA ARMSTRONG
Costello v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 4:2019cv00758
Plaintiff:
Katie Costello
Defendant:
Alltran Education, Inc. and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: Cory Chenault
as 18-8003
Debtor:
In re: CORY LAMON CHENAULT
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORY LAMON CHENAULT
Defendant:
GREAT LAKES HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bd of Ed of Highland School, et al v. Jane Doe
as 16-4117
Third Party - Appellant:
SUPERINTENDENT WILLIAM DODDS, HIGHLAND LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, PRINCIPAL SHAWN WINKELFOOS and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JOHN KING, Secretary of Education, LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
JANE DOE, a minor by and through her legal guardians JOYCE and JOHN DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
