Cases 11 - 20 of 33,059
Kelly v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv12239
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Kelly
Defendant:
David Greenleaf and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Drive Planning, LLC et al
as 2:2024mc51000
Defendant:
Burkhalter Ranch, Drive Planning, LLC, Jacqueline Burkhalter and others
Receiver:
Kenneth Dante Murena and Kenneth D. Murena
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Drive Planning, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00229
Defendant:
Drive Gulfport Properties, The Burkhalter Ranch, Russell Todd Burkhalter and others
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Keller v. $1,097,074 in United States Currency
as 5:2024mc50986
Plaintiff:
James S. Keller
Interested Party:
United States of America
Defendant:
$1,097,074 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America v. Swader
as 3:2024cv00999
Defendant:
Shatika Swader
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Health Care Fraud
Dale McQuistonIn re: Dale McQuiston
as 24-5736
Petitioner:
In re: DALE CONRAD MCQUISTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Certification of Judgment 23-01632/1695 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit et al v. Bannum Place of Saginaw, LLC et al
as 2:2024mc50958
Respondent:
Bannum Place of Saginaw, LLC and Bannum, Inc.
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Unknown:
Certification of Judgment 23-1632/1695 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hamed v. United States of America et al.
as 2:2024cv03838
Plaintiff:
IBRAHIM HAMED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
