Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Norton et al v. Toothman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00351
Plaintiff: Thomas Norton , George Norton , Carl Norton and others
Defendant: Stephanie Toothman, Ryan Zinke, USA Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
In Re: Terry Martin, et al
as 17-305
Petitioner: In re: TERRY MARTIN, CLYDE BAXTER, ANNETTE BAXTER and others
Respondent: BEHR DAYTON THERMAL PRODUCTS LLC, BEHR AMERICA, INC., CHRYSLER MOTORS LLC, nka Old Carco LLC and others
In re: Behr Dayton Thermal, et al
as 17-304
Petitioner: In re: BEHR DAYTON THERMAL PRODUCTS LLC, BEHR AMERICA, INC., CHRYSLER MOTORS LLC, nka Old Carco LLC and others
Respondent: TERRY MARTIN, DELLA GROOMS, LINDA RUSSEL, aka Linda Russell and others
Clyde Hardesty v. George Haber
as 17-3323
Debtor: In re: GEORGE DIB HABER
Appellant: CLYDE HARDESTY
Appellee: GEORGE DIB HABER
Norton et al v. Perry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00438
Plaintiff: Thomas Norton , George Norton , Carl Norton and others
Defendant: Marty Perry , Vanessa Zeoli , Clare Sipple and others
Counter_claimant: Clare Sipple
Counter_defendant: Thomas Norton , George Norton , Carl Norton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01164
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv13167
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Clyde Fountain
as 16-3769
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CLYDE FOUNTAIN
In re: Clyde Jone
as 16-5623
Movant: In re: CLYDE JONES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00026
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?