Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Lane et al v. Nissan of North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Nissan of North America, Inc. and Nissan Motor Co. Ltd
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lane, Debbie O'Connor and Michelle Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Michael Burnett v. Matt Macauley, et al
as 21-1023
Defendant / Appellee:
WENDY LANE, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, MATT MACAULEY, Warden, named as Matthew Macauley and D. BOLTON, Resident Unit Manager
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BURNETT
TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. v. Fast Lane Powersports, Inc.
as 2:2020mc50959
Defendant:
Fast Lane Powersports, Inc.
Plaintiff:
TCF Inventory Finance, Inc.
Michael Amble, et al v. Knox County, TN
as 20-5839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HICKS, JESSICA MORGAN, MICHAEL AMBLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE and KNOX COUNTY, TN
Terry RoachIn re: Terry Roach
as 20-5792
Respondent:
TIM LANE, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: TERRY W. ROACH
Howard Hawkins, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 20-3717
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK LAROSE, MIKE DEWINE and AMY ACTON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRETT JOSEPH, JOSEPH R. DEMARE, NATHANIEL LANE and others
Calvin Dibrell v. City of Knoxville, TN, et al
as 20-5528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN LYNDELL DIBRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF KNOXVILLE, TN, BRIAN BALDWIN, Individually and in his official capacity, JOEY WHITEHEAD, Individually and in his official capacity and others
William Walker v. City of Bowling Green, KY, et al
as 20-5370
Defendant:
JOHN MINTON, JOHN R. GRISE, GLENN BRATCHER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, KY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM B. WALKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marcus Lanes v. Noah Nagy
as 20-1008
Respondent / Appellee:
NOAH NAGY, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS D. LANES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
