Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2005
Plaintiff / Appellee: SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant / Appellant: ADAM ROSENTHAL
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2000
Plaintiff / Appellee: SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant: STEPHEN BUSCH, BRADLEY WURFEL, PATRICK COOK and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2008
Plaintiff / Appellee: SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD DALE SNYDER, former Governor, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor and ANDY DILLON, former State Treasurer
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
USA, ex rel Joseph Odish, et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1693
Defendant / Appellee: LAWRENCE ELLISON, HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., LARRY PAGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH ODISH and CRANBROOK CAPITAL CONSULTING GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel and MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
USA v. Andrew Schmidt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5454
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW PAUL SCHMIDT
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LaVance Turnage v. Ohio Dept of Rehabilitation, et al
as 19-3244
Defendant / Appellee: ALAN J. LAZAROFF, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution, STACEY L. PAINTER, Correctional Officer, Mansfield Correctional Institution, in personal and individual capacity, GARY C. MOHR, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAVANCE TURNAGE
Sarah Lee v. Ohio Education Association, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3250
Defendant: J. RICHARD LUMPE, in his official capacity as chair, vice-chair, and board member of the State Employment Relations Board, W. CRAIG ZIMPLER, in his official capacity as chair, vice-chair, and board member of the State Employment Relations Board, AVON LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, as representative of the class of all school districts in Ohio and others
Defendant / Appellee: OHIO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION and AVON LAKE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of the Ohio Education Association
Plaintiff / Appellant: SARAH R. LEE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schmidt
as 3:2018cv00320
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: John Gregory Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Lee v. Ohio Education Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01420
Plaintiff: Sarah R. Lee
Defendant: Ohio Education Association , Avon Lake Education Association , National Education Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2017cv00429
Plaintiff: Starling Y. Andrew
Defendant: Eric Schmidt and Roland K. Bowler, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?