Cases 21 - 30 of 3,243
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
California, State of v. Bosal Industries-Georgia, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv13150
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
Bosal Industries-Georgia, Inc. and Bosal USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
California, State of v. MAHLE Behr GmbH & Co. KG et al
as 4:2023cv13100
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
MAHLE Behr GmbH & Co. KG and MAHLE Behr USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
California, State of v. INOAC Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv12935
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
INOAC Corporation, INOAC Group North America, LLC and INOAC USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
California, State of v. Faurecia Abgastechnik GmbH et al
as 2:2023cv12907
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
Faurecia Abgastechnik GmbH, Faurecia Systemes d'Echappement, Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies, USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ContiTech USA, Inc. v. Plouse et al.
as 5:2023cv02069
Plaintiff:
ContiTech USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael T Plouse and GRT Rubber Technologies, LLC
Saat v. USA et al
as 6:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Christopher Saat
Defendant:
USA and USAA Federal Savings Bank
Signal Advisors USA, Inc. v. Entingh et al
as 2:2023cv12596
Plaintiff:
Signal Advisors USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Jonathan Mason Entingh and Reis Renneker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
