Cases 31 - 40 of 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Feagan et al v. The Office Of The Ohio Disciplinary Counsel For The Supreme Court Of The State Of Ohio et al
as 1:2021cv00399
Defendant:
The Office Of The Ohio Disciplinary Counsel For The Supreme Court Of The State Of Ohio, Kelli C. Schmidt, Donald Holtz and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C Deters, Glenn Feagan and Deters Law Firm PC II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehouse v. Keystone Law LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01135
Defendant:
Keystone Law LLC, Cassandra Blair Thomas and Cassandra Blair Thomas, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Cody Whitehouse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02383
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00830
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00497
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cunningham v. Yuspeh Rappaport Law LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Reliable Legal Marketing Consulting, LLC, Does 1-20 and Yuspeh Rappaport Law LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00503
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
