Cases 41 - 50 of 57
McKesson Corporation, et al
as 13-504
Petitioner:
In re: MCKESSON CORPORATION, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, AAIPHARMA LLC and others
McKesson Corporation, et al
as 13-510
Petitioner:
In re: MCKESSON CORPORATION, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
USA v. Eli Miller
as 13-3207
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELI M. MILLER
Amicus Curiae:
THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Eli Miller
as 13-3207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELI M. MILLER
USA v. David Cramer
as 12-6486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ELI CRAMER
Jefferson v. Corizon Health Care Providers et al
as 3:2012mc00058
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Providers, Eli Lilly Corp. and (f/n/u) Greenwood
Jefferson v. State of Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities et al
as 3:2011mc00010
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities, Western Mental Health Institute, Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute and others
In Re: Sealed Matter
as 2:2011cv10090
Plaintiff:
Anne E Mitchell, United States of America, Illinois, State of and others
Defendant:
United Medical Systems (DE), Incorporated, UMS Lithotripsy Management, LLC, Great Lakes Lithotripsy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
