Cases 41 - 50 of 109
William Walker v. Timothy Lane
as 19-5247
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM B. WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
TIMOTHY LANE
Vincent Lane v. Balinda Spain, et al
as 19-3148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT LANE
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER LOTTMAN, et al
Defendant / Appellee:
BALINDA SPAIN
Heather Hogrobrooks v. Byron Lane, et al
as 19-5109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER P. HOGROBROOKS
Defendant / Appellee:
BYRON R. LANE, MARTI GERARDI PROBATE PARALEGAL, INC. and PAUL ELISSIRY
City of Huntington, West Virginia et al v. Express Scripts Holding Company et al
as 1:2018op45984
Defendant:
Cross Lanes Family Pharmacy, Inc., PASTM, Inc., McCloud Family Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston, West Virginia, City of Kenova, West Virginia, Town of Ceredo, West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bluestone v. Sadove et al
as 3:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Robert Bluestone
Defendant:
Stephen I. Sadove , Mark Addicks, Donald E. Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States of America v. Douglas et al
as 2:2017mj30635
Defendant:
Kevin Scott Douglas and Katrina Lane Rickard
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Douglas et al
as 2:2017mj30635
Defendant:
Katrina Lane Rickard
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Williams v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Williams
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. , Stephen I. Sadove , James F. Hyatt, II and others
Movant:
Marcell Maseman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Breslau v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
David Breslau
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. , James F. Hyatt , Stephen I. Sadove and others
Movant:
Marcell Maseman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Raul v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 3:2017cv00494
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raul
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. , Stephen I. Sadove , James F. Hyatt, II and others
Movant:
Marcell Maseman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
