Cases 41 - 50 of 733
USA v. Stephen Walters
as 22-5930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN JAMES WALTERS
Branham v. Alen Park, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12341
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel-Lee Branham and Jacob Branham
Defendant:
Alen Park, City of, Chris Egan, Janet Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent:
ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
USA v. Stephen Jackson
as 22-3804
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN C. JACKSON
Dearborn Mid-West Company, LLC et al v. FM Sylvan, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv12114
Plaintiff:
Dearborn Mid-West Company, LLC and Dearborn Holding Company, LLC
Defendant:
FM Sylvan, Inc., Stephen Dorchak, Ernest Pandolfi and others
Beck v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2022cv12079
Plaintiff:
Steven Beck, David Braden, Mark Willard and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams County, PA, et alIn re: Adams County, PA, et al
as 22-3653
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ADAMS COUNTY, PA, LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP, PA, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA and others
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Anderson
as 3:2022mc00008
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Stephen Brandon Anderson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 80 Investment Company Act
Stephen Young
as 22-1608
Petitioner:
In re: STEPHEN R. YOUNG
Respondent:
SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden and SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
Marshall v. Hinkle et al
as 2:2022cv02667
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Marshall
Defendant:
James Hinkle, Stephen Dunbar and Judge Stephanie Mingo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
