Cases 51 - 60 of 153
Anthony Meeks v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 19-1320
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WARNER, M. LEVINE, OPT Unit Chief, HEARING INVESTIGATOR BRIDGES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY MEEKS
Grant County, New Mexico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45108
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
GRANT COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dashi Hursey v. Diane Anderson, et al
as 19-1118
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ALEXANDER, GABE GLUESING, JASON VAYRE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DASHI HURSEY
The ITC Techology Team, Inc. et al v. SOMA PSS, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01679
Plaintiff:
INTELLITECH CORPORATION, THE ITC TECHNOLOGY TEAM, INC. D/B/A ALERT PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS and The ITC Technology Team, Inc.
Defendant:
Patricia Wells, SOMA PSS, LLC, SOMA GLOBAL, LLC and others
United States of America v. Meldrum
as 2:2018mc50940
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Grant Meldrum
United States of America v. Meldrum
as 2:2018mc50941
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Grant Meldrum
Marshall County, Alabama et al v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2018op45230
Plaintiff:
Marshall County, Alabama , Albertville, Alabama, City of , Arab, Alabama and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., The and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tabor v. Madison Parish Hospital Service District, et al
as 1:2017mc00036
Plaintiff:
Barbara Tabor
Defendant:
Madison Parish Hospital Service District, et al
Garnishee:
Grant Konvalinka & Harrison
Dunn v. City of Sevierville
as 3:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
Arthur Grant Dunn
Defendant:
City of Sevierville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
