Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Day et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Day , Leonard Haslag , James McCormick and others
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., Paul C. Orberson, Jeff Orberson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Farrelly v. Barrett et al
as 2:2010cv12809
Plaintiff:
Maryellen Farrelly
Defendant:
Bruce Barrett, Daniel Follis, James Ausman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kachaylo v. Lees et al
as 4:2010cv00795
Plaintiff:
Brian Kachaylo
Defendant:
Gary Lees, John Schmidt, Ronald Haun and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lura Barrett
as 2:2010cr20014
Defendant:
Lura Barrett
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Oliver v. Vasbinder et al
as 2:2008cv13951
Plaintiff:
Joey Oliver
Defendant:
Doug Vasbinder , J Barrett , L Ford and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Southern Ohio Coal Company, et al v. Roy Blackburn, et al
as 09-4294
Petitioner:
SOUTHERN OHIO COAL COMPANY, CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY and CENTRAL OHIO COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ROY G. BLACKBURN, RAYMOND E. HOSTUTLER and others
Lovely v. Scutt et al
as 2:2009cv13898
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Lovely
Defendant:
Debra L Scutt, Joe Barrett, Ken Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Madany, et al v. Shahab, et al.
as 2:2009cv13693
Defendant:
Taquir Ahmed, Muhammad Shahab, Chiradeep Gupta and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ruqiayah Madany, John B. Collins and others
Petitioner:
Frank, Haron, Weiner and Navarro, Keith Wolnewitz, Wolnewitz & Verrelli PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
