Cases 61 - 70 of 135
Finn v. Chaldecott et al
as 2:2015cv12820
Plaintiff:
James M. Finn and Construction Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Robert Chaldecott, Donald Purdie, Jr., Bruce Pregler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castro v. Murphy Law Office, LLC
as 2:2015cv02624
Plaintiff:
Norma Castro
Defendant:
Murphy Law Office, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
John Murphy v. John Madden
as 15-1734
Debtor:
In re: ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC.
Appellant:
JOHN AUSTIN MURPHY
Appellee:
JOHN MADDEN, Liquidating Trustee
David Myers v. Gary Murphy
as 14-6107
Debtor:
In re: CITIZENS CORPORATRION AND FINANCIAL DATA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Appellant:
DAVID S. MYERS
Appellee:
GARY M. MURPHY
Murphy v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 2:2014cv13074
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Murphy
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy v. Credit Clearing House of America, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Murphy
Defendant:
Credit Clearing House of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Osaretin Eghaghe v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-4426
Petitioner:
OSARETIN EGHAGHE, aka Ehis Murphy, aka Inegnebose Airebamen, aka Inebose Arrebamen, aka Derrick Nobles
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
United Retired Got Employees, et al v. Rick Snyder, et al
as 13-2503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED RETIRED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, CITY OF PONTIAC RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, WALTER MOORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SNYDER, in his individual and/or official capacity as Governor for the State of Michigan, ANDY DILLON, in his individual and/or official capacity as Treasurer for the State of Michigan, STEVE ARWOOD, in his official capacity as Director of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs for the State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
