Cases 1 - 10 of 30
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Marly Guitron Roche De De Leon, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3739
Petitioner:
MARLY YOLANDA GUITRON ROCHE DE DE LEON, DILEAN TAMARA DE LEON GUITRON and ALISON PAMELA DE LEON GUITRON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Silva v. 13 Management et al
as 3:2021cv00480
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Silva
Defendant:
Judge William L. Campbell, Jr., Judge Joe Binkley, Judge Eli J. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1951
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679
Alison Arocho v. Ohio University
as 20-4239
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALISON AROCHO
Jamel Robinson v. Hanna Saad, et al
as 20-1873
Defendant / Appellee:
PAIGE E. HILLIER, RN, JILL LAWRENCE, Psychologist, ALEKSANDRA WILANOWSKI, Psychiatrist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL LEON ROBINSON
Alison Taylor v. City of Saginaw, et al
as 20-1588
Cross Appellant:
TABITHA HOSKINS, CITY OF SAGINAW and CITY OF SAGINAW, MI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALISON PATRICIA TAYLOR
Alison Taylor v. City of Saginaw, et al
as 20-1538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALISON PATRICIA TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAGINAW and TABITHA HOSKINS
Cross Appellant:
CITY OF SAGINAW, MI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
