Cases 1 - 10 of 19
In re: Roy Brownlee
as 23-2048
Petitioner:
In re: ROY EDWARD BROWNLEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dixon v. Brownlee
as 2:2023cv12661
Defendant:
Cherina Brownlee and Cherina Olgetree
Plaintiff:
Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr.
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Knox Trailers, Inc., et al v. Jeff Clark, et al
as 23-5218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KNOX TRAILERS, INC. and POST TRAILER REPAIRS, INC.
Defendant:
JEFF CLARK, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY BAILEY, Individually, BILLY MAPLES, Individually, AMANDA MAPLES, Individually and others
USA v. Roy Brownlee
as 23-1008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY EDWARD BROWNLEE
USA v. Roy Brownlee
as 22-2166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY EDWARD BROWNLEE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019md02901
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith, Ryan Combs, Al Balls and others
In Re:
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Eddie Brownlee v. Kenneth Black
as 21-4075
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDDIE BROWNLEE
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden
USA v. Roy Brownlee
as 21-2591
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY EDWARD BROWNLEE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
