Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fd Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Emmanuel HoustonIn re: Emmanuel Houston
as 24-5233
Petitioner:
In re: EMMANUEL BIBB HOUSTON
Respondent:
SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden
USA v. Lamont Brown
as 24-5068
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAMONT HOUSTON BROWN
USA v. Darien Houston
as 23-5924
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARIEN HOUSTON
Sean Houston, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-1530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN HOUSTON
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE KRISTINI DAVENPORT TRUST
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, US Department of Justice, JANET YELLEN, US Department of Treasury, DEBORAH HAALAND, US Department of Interior and others
Houston v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Brian Houston
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Matthew Eisenhower, Chris Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Houston et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv13036
Plaintiff:
Sean Houston, Romaine Kristini Davenport Trust and Sean Houston [E-filer]
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Interior and others
Jimmy HoustonIn re: Jimmy Houston
as 22-3888
Petitioner:
In re: JIMMY L. HOUSTON
Respondent:
KEITH J. FOLEY, Warden
LM General Insurance Company, et al v Northland Radiology, Inc, et al
as 2:2022cv12211
Plaintiff:
LM General Insurance Company, LM Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Northland Radiology, Inc., Great Lakes Pain & Injury Centers LLC, Pioneer Lab Houston LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
