Cases 1 - 10 of 14
USA v. David Kemper
as 22-5477
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID KEMPER
In re: Hartshorne Holdings, et alIn re: In re: Hartshorne Holdings, et al
as 20-8025
Debtor:
In re: HARTSHORNE HOLDINGS, LLC
Appellant:
HARTSHORNE LAND, LLC, HARTSHORNE MINING GROUP, LLC, HARTSHORNE MINING, LLC and others
Appellee:
INDIANA-KENTUCKY ELECTRIC CORPORATION, KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY, MINOVA USA, INC. and others
Rosenblatt v. Infinity Property and Casualty Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Defendant:
Infinity Property and Casualty Corp., James R. Gober, Glen N Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Christian Care Center of Kuttawa, LLC et al v. Kemper
as 3:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Christian Care Center of Kuttawa, LLC and Care Centers Management Consulting, Inc.
Defendant:
Vicki Kemper
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv14973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Terry v. Delanor, Kemper & Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02803
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Terry
Defendant:
Delanor, Kemper & Associates, LLC, Frank D. Watson and Wilton K. Caver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Redd v. Delanor, Kemper & Associates, LLC
as 2:2010cv01004
Plaintiff:
Charles Redd
Defendant:
Delanor, Kemper & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Heaton v. Delanor, Kemper & Associates, LLC
as 1:2010cv00534
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Heaton
Defendant:
Delanor, Kemper & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
