Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff: GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant: RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff: George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant: Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Walburn et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv04621
Plaintiff: Chaz Lawson, Vicki P. Slone, James A Walburn and others
Defendant: Clyde Dulin, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Bechtel Jacobs Co LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Dedra Johnson, et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5649
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEDRA JOHNSON, United States of America ex rel, RANDALL PRATHER, United States of America ex rel, AL STAKELIN, United States of America ex rel and others
Plaintiff: ANDREW STAMPER, United States of America ex rel
Defendant - Appellee: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Lockheed Martin Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Com We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4108
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Defendant: TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY and TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00673
Plaintiff: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Defendant: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Travelers Casualty & Surety Company and Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Walburn, et al v. Lockheed Martin Corp, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1996cv00722
Plaintiff: Jeff Walburn and Karen Sue Walburn
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Utility Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
State of Ohio, ex rel., Betty D. Montgomery et al v. Chemical Land Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2002cv00193
Plaintiff: State of Ohio, ex rel., Betty D. Montgomery
Defendant: Chemical Land Holdings, Inc., Maxus Energy Corporation, Crompton Manufacturing Company, Inc., and others
Cross Defendant: Occidental Chemcial Corporation, Painsville Township Board of Trustees, Village of Fairport Harbor and others
Cross Claimant: Scepter Management Corporation, Inc. and Painesville PRP Group
Counter Defendant: Tiera Solutions, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Philip Metals Recovery (USA) Inc. and Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Maxus Energy Corporation et al v. Ace Lakefront Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2000cv00972
Cross Defendant: Maxus Energy Corporation, Chemical Land Holdings, Environmental Brine Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: Ace Lakefront Properties, Inc., Dartron Corporation, Eltech Systems Corporation and others
Counter Defendant: Cousins, Inc. and Scepter Management Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant: Aluminum Smelting & Refining Company, Inc. and Occidental Chemcial Corporation
Cross Claimant: Philip Metal Recovery (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Natural Resources De, et al v. Lockheed Martin Corp, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:1999cv00170
Plaintiff: Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. , Thomas B. Cochran , Ronald B. Fowler and others
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation , Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. , Martin Marietta Corporation and others
Counter_claimant: Lockheed Martin Corporation , Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Utility Systems, Inc.
Counter_defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?