Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Larry Bowles, et al v. Bourbon County, KY, et al
as 21-5012
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY COX-LYNN, LPN, Individually, TRENA PRESTON, Individually, MATTHEW P. JOHNSTON, ARNP, Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
N.H.S.B., Next Friend of Larry Bowles and Austin Bowles, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Shannon Bowles, LARRY BOWLES, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Shannon Bowles, C.D.B., Next Friend of Larry Bowles and Austin Bowles, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Shannon Bowles and others
Defendant:
BOURBON COUNTY, KY
Robert Rolston, et al v. TN, et al
as 19-6309
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM J. FAIMON, PATTI MCNANEY, ROSEMARY DUCKLO SEXTON, District Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ROLSTON and CATHERINE R. DUNLAP-ROLSTON
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Alston-Jones v. Pridgen et al
as 1:2012mc00025
Plaintiff:
Anna-Maria Alston-Jones
Defendant:
John C. Pridgen, Robert Chasteen, T. Christopher Hughes and others
Michigan Surgery Investment, et al v. Arman, et al
as 10-1612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHIGAN SURGERY INVESTMENT, LLC, VEI - MICHIGAN, INC. and VISIONARY ENTERPRISES, INC., fka Voluntary Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
MOHAMMED ARMAN, CARL T. BERGREN, RICARDO D. BORREGO and others
Defendant:
OAKWOOD ENTERPRISES, INC. and OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC.
Michigan Surgery Investment, LLC et al v. Arman et al
as 2:2009cv14656
Plaintiff:
Michigan Surgery Investment, LLC, VEI - Michigan, Inc., Visionary Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mohammed Arman, Carl T. Bergren, Ricardo D. Borrego and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Kady v. Haus, et al
as 4:2007cv01658
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Matthew P. Haus, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Diana L. Kady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
