Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Wooten v. Morgan & Morgan et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Shanneel Wooten
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan, Deanne Hamilton, Travis Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 2302 Federal Whistleblowing Act / Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA)
Thomas WootenIn re: Thomas Wooten
as 22-2154
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS WILLIAM WOOTEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent:
ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
BESL Transfer Company v Leroy A. Wooten's Transport Services, LLC
as 3:2020cv01722
Plaintiff:
The BESL Transfer Company and BESL Transfer Company
Defendant:
Leroy A. Wooten's Transport Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Thomas WootenIn re: Thomas Wooten
as 20-1736
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS WILLIAM WOOTEN
English v. Wooten et al
as 5:2019cv12463
Defendant:
Sarah Ford, Deanna Wooten and II Enterprises
Plaintiff:
Troy English
John Wooten v. Pat Warren
as 19-1437
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN OLIVER WOOTEN
Respondent / Appellee:
PAT WARREN, Warden and PATRICK WARREN
Patricia Adams, et al v. Cincinnati Children's Hospital
as 19-3302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE NOBLE, JOSEPH BAUMGARDNER, BARBARA MCCLURE, as Executrix of the Estate on behalf of Robert Ellington on behalf of Connie McClure-Ellington and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
Wooten v. Purdue Pharmaceuticals, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45145
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Doyle T. Wooten
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
