Real Property Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 408
USA upon the relation and for the use of the TVA v. An Easement and Right-of-Way, and Billie Watson
as 2:2024cv00174
Defendant: An Easement and Right-of-Way, Etc., More or Less, in Sullivan County, Tennessee, and and Billie Watson a/k/a Billie Jean Watson
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right of Way, Etc., More or Less, in Franklin County, Tennessee, and et al
as 4:2024cv00067
Defendant: Robert Peck Fletcher II and An Easement and Right of Way, Etc., More or Less, in Franklin County, Tennessee, and
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
United States of America v. A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Cheatham County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv01010
Defendant: Heather J. Harant, A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Cheatham County, Tennessee and Philip E. Harant, Jr
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
United States of America v. A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Cheatham County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv01011
Defendant: James A. Bloodgood, A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Cheatham County, Tennessee and Jodi A. Bloodgood
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Rubin Lublin TN PLLC v. Greenberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00752
Cross-Defendant: Orange County CA Dept Child Support Services (OC DCSS), Barbara Fritz, Tamar Arminak and others
Defendant: Daniel S. Greenberg, Carla D. Gifford, Estate of Marian Wise and others
Plaintiff: Rubin Lublin TN PLLC
Cross-Plaintiff: Daniel S. Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Real Property
Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC v. Greenberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00591
Plaintiff: Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC
Defendant: Daniel S. Greenberg, Carla D. Gifford, The Estate of Marian Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Real Property
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 17.697 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant: 17.697 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, James W. Granbery, James Treanor Granbery, III and others
Counter Defendant: Tianda Tavares
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant: 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Manuel Quinonez Silvestre, PennyMac Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.936 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00475
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant: 2.936 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee and Toni Kelley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?