Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Flores v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01332
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diana Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11743
Plaintiff:
Lillian Chandler , Patricia Coffey , Margueritt Davis and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers et al v. Flores et al
as 3:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
Doug Flowers and Anne Flowers
Defendant:
Mario Alberto Flores and Juan Carranco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2015cv13710
Petitioner:
Eric Flores
Respondent:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Atkinson et al v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. I et al
as 3:2015cv00658
Plaintiff:
Angel Atkinson , Kim Aunkst , Etta Avant and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. I , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Flores et al
as 2:2015cv02035
Defendant:
Isair Flores, Jason Hicks, FedEx Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02034
Plaintiff:
Isair Flores
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation , FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc. and Jason Hicks
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Mae Flores
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00542
Plaintiff:
Sandy Flores
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Flores v. HHS, et al
as 12-5223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and SIERRA MEDICAL CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
