Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Sims v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al.
as 2:2018cv01359
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
SABRINA SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2018cv12387
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Nick Lyon, Andy Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Prewitt, Aston Marion, Marion Harris-Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv12007
Plaintiff:
Melba Barton , Willie J. Barton, Jr. , Jeffery Barton and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER, Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2018cv12007
Plaintiff:
Barby Bettis, Willie Lay, Emma Hill and others
Defendant:
Veolia North America, LLC, Jeff Wright, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Atrium Medical Corp.
as 4:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Sims
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims v. Osborn et al
as 2:2017cv12210
Defendant:
John Osborn , Allstate Vehicle Property Insurance Company and Frances Woodward
Plaintiff:
Robert Sims
Adame et al v. Meridia EXP, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Proto Adame , Jose Hernandez , Nicolas Vargas-Castrejon and others
Defendant:
Meridia EXP, LLC, CSX Corporation , CSXT Transportation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Sims v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01811
Plaintiff:
Jane Sims
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims v. Williams et al
as 2:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Ashley Sims
Defendant:
Calvin Williams and LTI Trucking Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sim et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ima Jean Sim and William Sim
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
