Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Susanna Cohen-Feris et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Susanna Cohen-Feris , Sally Antone , Randi Andrews and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02062
Plaintiff:
Beth Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01383
Plaintiff:
Nancy Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01414
Plaintiff:
Tracey Lyn Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Beneficial Kentucky Inc.
as 5:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Donna Freeman
Defendant:
Beneficial Kentucky Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Washington-Freeman v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00974
Plaintiff:
Joe-Ann Washington-Freeman
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dornon v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02437
Plaintiff:
Walter Freeman Dornon
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01300
Plaintiff:
Jacob Freeman Byers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Target Corporation
as 2:2014cv12980
Plaintiff:
Karen Freeman
Defendant:
Target Corporation , Target Stores and TARGET STORE#0776
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baxter Bailey & Associates v. Freeman
as 2:2014cv02158
Plaintiff:
Baxter Bailey & Associates
Defendant:
Charles L. Freeman III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
