Cases 41 - 50 of 311
SEARLE v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv13827
Plaintiff:
PAUL SEARLE
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and MICHAEL PALAZOLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Phyllis Bechtold, et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 16-4210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHYLLIS BECHTOLD, CATHY BEIL, NANCY BEGLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.
Christopher Atwood, et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 16-4206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ATWOOD, JOSHUA AULT, GAYLE BACHMANN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.
Calvin v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02443
Plaintiff:
Denise Calvin
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ash v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00892
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linn Ash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lloyd Potolicchio v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 16-6069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD L. POTOLICCHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC USA INC, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. and others
Logan Schmidt v. Boston Scientific Corporation, et al
as 16-3452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOGAN SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, MEDTRONIC, INC. and DOE ENTITIES 1-3
Hawn et al v. Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Donald Hawn and Pam Hawn
Defendant:
Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. , Medtronic Inc. and Unomedical A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warstler v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00385
Plaintiff:
Randy Warstler
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., John Doe I and John Doe II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wheaton v. West Chester Hospital, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Delana Wheaton
Defendant:
West Chester Hospital, LLC , UC Health , TriHealth Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
