Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dell v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01661
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Richard Dell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01763
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Willie Dell Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klein v. University of Michigan Board of Regents et al
as 2:2017cv11192
Plaintiff:
Dennis Klein
Defendant:
University of Michigan Board of Regents, University of Michigan Medical Center, Jim Harvey and others
O'Dell v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2016cv01078
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Dell
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Dell et al v. Gates Motors Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00916
Plaintiff:
Gerald O'Dell and Dwayne O'Dell
Defendant:
Gates Motors Inc., Gates Toyota, Inc., Gates Chevy World Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McBride v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01110
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Dell McBride
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dell et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14638
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Dell and Clarence Dell
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Livingston v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20850
Plaintiff:
Dell Livingston
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv02596
Plaintiff:
Veronica Dell King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trull et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20521
Plaintiff:
Iva Dell Trull and Larry Dale Trull
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
