Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Moses v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Eli Moses
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simmons v. Genesee, County of et al
as 4:2024cv10815
Defendant:
YesCare Corp, CHS TX, Inc, Genesee, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Kristen Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moses et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moses and Denise Moses
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Navarrette v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Moses Navarrette
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moses et al v. Medical Depot, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01022
Plaintiff:
Sandra Moses and Brenda Hatfield
Defendant:
Medical Depot, Inc. doing business as Drive Devilbiss Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vernon v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02725
Plaintiff:
Moses W. Vernon
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moses v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Moses
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mounts et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00086
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Mounts, Larry Epling, Mabel Epling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
McCoy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04865
Plaintiff:
Moses McCoy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moses et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04379
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Moses and Pamela Moses
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
