Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Blevins et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10172
Plaintiff:
Kathy McCree, Margo Carpenter, Vernita Coleman and others
Defendant:
Michael Prysby, Leo A. Daly Company, Rowe Professional Services Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2022cv12140
Plaintiff:
Renae Allen
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Rigney et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rigney, Danielle Hall, Tracy Kilburn and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., James Hughey and Sherry Hughey
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101 Interstate Commerce Act
Carter et al v. Wilson
as 3:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Carter, Rena Carter and Christie R. Ball
Defendant:
Brittany S. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Holmes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02069
Plaintiff:
Renae Holmes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamler v. WALMART STORES, EAST, L.P.
as 2:2021cv02680
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Rena Hamler
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, EAST, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gee v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04535
Plaintiff:
Rena Gee
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Altman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00736
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Renae Altman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharif Bey v. Peterson et al
as 2:2020cv10061
Plaintiff:
Tariff Sharif Bey
Defendant:
Renae Peterson and Monroe Police Department
Mahan et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2019cv12665
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Glasgow, Stephen Busch and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Harris, Roberta Flowers, Mary Koivupera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
