Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow v. Comprehensive Pain Specialist et al
as 3:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brenda Farrow
Defendant:
Comprehensive Pain Specialist and Rebacca Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dodd v. Simmons et al
as 1:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Walter Earl Dodd, Jr.
Defendant:
Jerry Simmons, Charles Pierce and City of Centerville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00637
Petitioner:
John Pierce Lankford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Thomas et al v. Campbell County, TN et al
as 3:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
Tracy Thomas and Tracy Thomas
Defendant:
Campbell County, TN, Campbell County Board of Education, Campbell County High School and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pierce v. Hamblen County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Billie D Pierce
Defendant:
Hamblen County, Tennessee and Unnamed Detention Officers in the Hamblen County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
