Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv12331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hill et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al
as 2:2012cv02191
Plaintiff:
Token Gifts, Inc. of Oregon , Token Gifts, Inc of Tennessee and Dietrich Hill
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee; , Larry Godwin , Toney Armstrong and others
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
William Townsend v. Samuel Mays, Jr., et al
as 11-6547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ATREL TOWNSEND, aka Abdullah Rafiz Shaheed Ashanti
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge, FRED GODWIN, Assistant U.S. Attorney and S.A. ANDREW HUCKSTADT, F.B.I.
Newton v. Lawson et al
as 2:2011cv03037
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Newton
Defendant:
G. Lawson , Larry Godwin, Tony Armstrong and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Kincannon v. Detroit Public Schools et al
as 2:2011cv13780
Plaintiff:
Kharon Kincannon
Defendant:
Detroit Public Schools , L. maxie, Godwin Iduma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Street et al
as 2:2011cv02438
Plaintiff:
Terry Benson
Defendant:
Christopher Street, Michael Bishop, Bobby Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Wharton et al
as 2:2011cv02193
Plaintiff:
Anthony Decarlo Hayes, Sr.
Defendant:
A.C. Wharton, City of Memphis, Deneen Alsadi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Jones et al
as 2:2011cv02175
Plaintiff:
Erique Richardson
Defendant:
T. Jones, C. Turner, D. Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devante v. Woods et al
as 2:2011cv02176
Plaintiff:
Allison Devante
Defendant:
Paul Woods, Timothy Rush, Tonia Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
