Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 509
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3272
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5280
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chorazghiazad v. Holmes et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff: Mohammad Chorazghiazad
Defendant: Judge Barbara Holmes and Judge Aleta A. Trauger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3243
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff: ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant: JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff: ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant: JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Kelsey Campbell v. Michelle Cordova
as 24-3175
Plaintiff: KELSEY E. CAMPBELL
Defendant: JUDGE MICHELLE L. CORDOVA
Kimberly Edelstein, et al v. Ann Flottman, et al
as 24-3169
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY A. EDELSTEIN, Individually and as parent on behalf of S. E. and S.E., a minor
Defendant: ANN FLOTTMAN, Judge, Individually and in her Official Capacity, CRAIG WEBB, Magistrate, KIMBERLY KENT, Individually and in her Official Capacity and others
Kimberly Edelstein, et al v. Ann Flottman, et al
as 24-3156
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY A. EDELSTEIN, Individually and as parent on behalf of S. E. and S.E., a minor
Defendant: ANN FLOTTMAN, Judge, Individually and in her Official Capacity, CRAIG WEBB, Magistrate, KIMBERLY KENT, Individually and in her Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?