Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Rachel Shaw v. City of Dayton, et al
as 16-3575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RACHEL SHAW, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the Deceased, Kylen English
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DAYTON, OFFICER ALEX MAGILL and JOHN/JANE DOE, Supervisor(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Shaver v. Brimfield Township, et al
as 15-3089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD SHAVER, Administrator of the Estate of Deceased Mark Shaver
Defendant:
BRIMFIELD TOWNSHIP
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PORTAGE COUNTY, DAVID W. DOAK, Individually and in his official capacity as Portage County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv13466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Cole v. Lincoln Park, City of et al
as 2:2013cv13826
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cole
Defendant:
Lincoln Park, City of, Scott Kerr, James Howell and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bryner et al v. Portage County et al
as 5:2012cv02082
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Bryner and Tiffany M. Bryner
Defendant:
Portage County, Ohio/Portage County Board of Commissioners, David W. Doak, John Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
