Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 13-5736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Office of Civil Rights, TOM VILSACK, Official Capacity, JOE LEONARD, Official Capacity and others
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 13-5735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Office of Civil Rights, TOM VILSACK, Official Capacity, JOE LEONARD, Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ellyn Burnes v. Barack Obama, et al
as 13-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLYN J. BURNES
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, ROBERT MUELLER, III, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Corey Lea v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 13-5214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS, TOM VILSACK, Official Capacity, JOE LEONARD, Official Capacity and others
Rizk v. Holder et al
as 2:2012cv15068
Plaintiff:
jamal rizk
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, Robert Mueller, III and Timothy J Healy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv15059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination
Louie Johnston, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 12-5910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIE E. JOHNSTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JERRY MARTIN, U.S. Attorneys, THOMAS PEREZ, U.S. Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
