Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Hansen v. Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00523
Plaintiff:
Randy N. Hansen and Randy N. Hansen
Defendant:
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc., Craig A. Bohning, Douglas E. Romer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nuzaira Rahman v. Michael Chertoff, et al
as 09-3437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NUZAIRA M. RAHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and MARK B. HANSEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv13630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Rourke v. Enervest Operating, LLC et al
as 5:2008cv11699
Plaintiff:
Eugene O'Rourke
Defendant:
Enervest Operating, LLC and Mark Hansen
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Kodsy v. Washburn et al
as 2:2007cv13616
Plaintiff:
Magdy Kodsy
Defendant:
Dennis Washburn, Jason Hansen and Phillip Young
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gomez et al v. Hansen et al
as 1:2007cv02266
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gomez Gomez and Sherry Speelman
Defendant:
Mark Hansen and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Choulguina v. Hansen et al
as 2:2007cv00620
Plaintiff:
Natalia Choulguina
Defendant:
Mark Hansen and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Hassan v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00617
Plaintiff:
Mohamud Farah Hassan
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Robert S Mueller, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Ortiz v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00151
Plaintiff:
Samer Kader Ortiz
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Robert S Mueller, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Anabtawi v. Hansen et al
as 2:2007cv00291
Plaintiff:
Hani Anabtawi
Defendant:
Mark Hansen, Michael Chertoff and F. Gerard Heinauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
