Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Clark v. United States Government
as 0:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Santa Roy Allen Clark
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carney v. Whitton et al
as 2:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gerald Carney
Defendant:
Joshua Whitton , Scott Allen and Rodney Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. University of Kentucky
as 5:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Crosby
Defendant:
Eli Capilouto, Timothy Tracy, William Thro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flint v. Noble et al
as 3:2015cv00688
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Flint
Defendant:
Mary C. Noble , Bill Cunningham , Michelle M. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mize et al v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Mize and Corey Mize
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Jackie Strode, Tom Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Chris Belt and Mychal Denale Davis
Defendant:
Edward Tyrone Carter, Leslie Allen Duncan and City of Oak Grove, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Shanice Jeanine Ross
Defendant:
Edward Tyrone Carter, Leslie Allen Duncan and City of Oak Grove, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coitrone v. Murray et al
as 1:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
James H. Coitrone
Defendant:
Bobby D. Murray , Ricki L. Allen and Brett Coomes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. City of Franklin et al
as 1:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Stewart
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Franklin Police Department, Barren River Area Development District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
