Cases 41 - 50 of 308
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sanderson v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sanderson and Nicholas Sanderson doing business as SCS Management
Defendant:
Eaton County, Christopher Garrison, Chris Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sims v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Montoyya Sims
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Petition for Removal - Tort Claims Procedure
Lucio v. Vital Property Management, LLC
as 1:2022cv12447
Plaintiff:
Lola Lucio
Defendant:
Vital Property Management, LLC and GEN6 Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lucio v. JKJ Property Management, LLC
as 2:2022cv12288
Plaintiff:
Lola Lucio
Defendant:
JKJ Property Management, LLC and Slo Bones Smoke Haus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hale v. Silva et al
as 2:2022cv12118
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kajuan D. Hale
Defendant:
Mr. John Paul Silva, Silva Property Management and 905 N Stephenson Highway LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
